Skip to main content

Ministry: Fellowship In Joy and Firm Faith

Ministry: Fellowship In Joy and Firm Faith

Joy in faith increasing, love expressed, and righteousness bearing fruit in 2 Corinthians

(For a thesis framing, see “The Church as Glory and Joy — Paul’s Ultimate Reward.”)


Introduction: Paul’s “reward” is fellowship in the church’s maturity in faith, not personal gain

Paul’s boast, joy, and confidence in ministry are not anchored in personal gain, status, or a funded lifestyle. They are anchored in the spiritual growth and perseverance of believers—the church standing firm in faith, growing into Christ, and becoming a mature body that reflects His life. This thread begins immediately in 2 Corinthians and must govern how we read later contested passages. If we read the “giving” chapters (2 Corinthians 8–9) through modern fundraising assumptions, we will distort Paul. If we read them through Paul’s stated aims—joy, faith, love, unity, sincerity—we see a coherent apostolic pattern: material acts may be real, but the “fruit” is spiritual; and the minister’s crown is the church’s conformity to Christ.


1) 2 Corinthians 1: ministry begins in affliction and ends in the church’s joy

Paul opens with affliction, comfort, endurance, and faith. God comforts Paul in affliction so Paul can strengthen others (2 Corinthians 1:3–4). The logic is formative, not transactional: suffering becomes the arena where trust in God is learned and where the church is built up. Paul describes pressure that felt like a death sentence “so that we would not trust in ourselves, but in God who raises the dead” (2 Corinthians 1:9). This is why Paul can define ministry authority as non-coercive: “not that we lord it over your faith, but we are workers with you for your joy, for you stand firm in faith” (2 Corinthians 1:24). The “success metric” is the church’s stability and joy in faith.


2) Boasting as integrity for their sake, not self-promotion

When Paul speaks of boasting, he does not boast in income, outcomes, or status. He boasts in conscience—transparent sincerity toward the Corinthians (2 Corinthians 1:12). He is guarding the gospel from corruption by insisting his conduct is not manipulative, not fleshly, and not self-serving. This integrity theme sets a boundary for later chapters: any interpretation that turns Paul’s language into coercion, greed, or spiritualized fundraising violates the moral frame he establishes at the start.


3) Partnership in Christ: κοινων- language defined by fellowship, not donor rhetoric

Paul’s κοινων- word-family is often exploited today as “partner with our ministry,” meaning money. But in 2 Corinthians it is defined first as fellowship in Christ’s life: in 2 Corinthians 1:7 Paul calls the Corinthians κοινωνοί (koinōnoi)—participants—in sufferings and comfort, expressed as prayerful co-labor (2 Corinthians 1:11). Therefore, when fellowship/participation language appears later, it must remain tethered to shared life and shared service within the body, not imported donor categories.


4) 2 Corinthians 8–9: a real collection, fenced against coercion, with a spiritual harvest

Paul previously spoke explicitly to Corinth about “the collection for the saints” (1 Corinthians 16:1–4). This is inferred in reading and translating 2 Corinthians 8–9, which are chapters that heavily drift from original Greek, read more about this in the Deep dive section.

Inferring 1 Corinthians 16:1–4 it is as saints-directed benevolence administered carefully and voluntarily. Yet Paul refuses to interpret the service as a financial technique. The giving is fenced against pressure: it is prepared as a “blessing” εὐλογία (eulogia) and not as πλεονεξία (pleonexia)—greed/exaction (2 Corinthians 9:5), and it is explicitly “not under compulsion” (2 Corinthians 9:7). The “sowing/reaping” image cannot be turned into prosperity mechanics because Paul defines the increase as the fruit of δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosynē)—righteousness (2 Corinthians 9:10). The act may be tangible, but the harvest is moral and Godward: righteousness-bearing fruit, thanksgiving, unity, and love proven in deed.

A parallel distinction appears in Philippians: Paul acknowledges material support while in prison, yet insists he seeks “the fruit increasing to your account,” not the gift as an end in itself (Philippians 4:15–17), and frames the gift as pleasing to God (Philippians 4:18). The act is material; the fruit he seeks is spiritual.


5) Equality and mutuality in the household of God

Paul’s stated aim is not burdening one group to relieve another permanently, but equality and mutual care: “your abundance… their need… that there may be equality” (2 Corinthians 8:13–14). This is not tithing law; it is household faithfulness—saints caring for saints. The broader New Testament ethic harmonizes: do good to all, especially the household of faith (Galatians 6:10); if one has worldly goods and refuses help to a brother in need, the love of God is not abiding in him (1 John 3:17); love must be in deed and truth (1 John 3:18).

1 John is a litmus test for a true church, it loves inwardly first. Benevolence is an expression of living faith through love, not a mechanism used self-enrichment. Often in outreach ministry there is a pretense of piety in serving which overlooks the treatment of God's children. Such breaks the commandments of God in the name of traditions and commissions, which is obviously scripturally wrong.


6) Ephesians 4: the purpose of ministry is edification into unity and Christlikeness

This spiritual fruit—faith expressed through love, sincerity without coercion, unity and thanksgiving—is precisely the kind of church-maturity that functions as Paul’s boast and joy (2 Corinthians 1:24; 2 Corinthians 8:24). It also aligns directly with the purpose of ministry in Ephesians 4: Christ gives gifted servants “for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the building up of the body of Christ,” until the church attains “the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God,” growing into maturity and into “the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:11–13). The means is “speaking the truth in love,” by which the body grows up into Christ (Ephesians 4:15–16). Therefore, unsound doctrines that weaponize Scripture for coercion and gain are not minor errors; they oppose the stated end of ministry and produce the instability Ephesians 4 warns against—being “tossed to and fro” by doctrinal winds and human craftiness (Ephesians 4:14).


Conclusion: Paul’s crown is Christ formed in a steadfast people

2 Corinthians must be read with Paul’s opening frame still in view: affliction producing trust, sincerity guarding the gospel, and ministry defined as labor for the church’s joy and firmness of faith. When Paul later addresses a saints-directed collection, the apostolic logic remains: the giving is voluntary and fenced against compulsion, and the “increase” is righteousness-bearing fruit, not donor enrichment. The minister’s true glory is not money received but Christ formed in a stable, maturing people—a church growing into unity of faith and knowledge of Jesus, speaking truth in love, and being built up into His likeness.


Deep Dive Exegesis


Lemma audit for 2 Corinthians 8–9 (guarding meaning against fundraising drift)

(For the big-picture thesis thread that frames this audit, see “The Church as Glory and Joy — Paul’s Ultimate Reward”.)

Method and guardrails

Goal: establish what 2 Corinthians 8–9 actually says by (1) tracking Paul’s repeated lemmas, (2) constraining them by immediate context, (3) comparing them with Paul’s broader usage, and (4) refusing imported assumptions (prosperity, tithing-law, clergy-income).

Rule: where English requires a supplied verb (ellipsis), we treat it as translation convenience unless the Greek explicitly states it.


1) Grace as the controlling frame

Paul repeatedly frames the whole action as grace, not “fundraising.”

  • Lemma: χάρις (charis) = grace/favor (not “payment,” not “wages”).

  • In context: “the grace of God” is what is given and operating in the churches (2 Corinthians 8:1). It is not “a privilege you buy into,” but divine action producing a Christlike response.

  • Inference: If the motivating cause is χάρις (charis), then any interpretation that treats the giving as a transaction (pay → receive) contradicts Paul’s causal framing. Grace is not an investment instrument.


2) Fellowship/participation vs “partner with my ministry”

Paul’s κοινων- language is easy to weaponize today (“be a partner”), but its meaning is governed by Paul’s earlier use and by its object in 8–9.

  • Lemmas:

  • Anchor in the letter: Paul already defined “partnership” in 2 Corinthians as shared participation in Christ’s sufferings/comfort (2 Corinthians 1:7), expressed as prayerful co-labor (2 Corinthians 1:11).

  • Object in 8–9: the fellowship/participation is explicitly “of the service to the saints” (2 Corinthians 8:4; 2 Corinthians 9:1).

  • Inference: Because the object is “service to the saints,” “partnership” here cannot be reduced to “fund the apostle’s lifestyle.” It is fellowship expressed as shared participation in a saints-directed ministry.

Drift warning: Translating κοινωνία (koinōnia) as “partnership” is not automatically wrong, but preaching it as “donor partnership with our organization” is a category swap. Paul’s category is shared life + shared service within the body, not an external support model.


3) Single-heartedness is the moral core of the giving

This is one of the most commonly tilted words.

  • Lemma: ἁπλότης (haplotēs) = singleness/simplicity/sincerity (without duplicity); it can express liberality, but it is not inherently “money.”

  • In context: the Macedonians’ response is described as an overflow of ἁπλότης (haplotēs) alongside affliction and poverty (2 Corinthians 8:2).

  • Inference: Paul is emphasizing the heart-quality (single, sincere) that makes the act clean—this is a built-in anti-manipulation safeguard. Where “generosity” is used in English, it should not erase the moral center: no duplicity, no calculating, no coercion.


4) Power/capacity: avoid financializing Paul’s phrasing

  • Lemma: δύναμις (dynamis) = power/capacity/ability.

  • In context: Paul testifies they acted “according to” and “beyond” δύναμις (dynamis) (2 Corinthians 8:3). The statement is elliptical; English often supplies “they gave” for readability.

  • Why “means” tilts: “means” can make the entire claim sound like a donor financial threshold. But Paul’s lexeme is broader: capacity/ability under affliction.

  • Inference: This phrase supports a moral point (willingness beyond normal capacity), not a fundraising technique (“give past your budget to unlock blessings”). If the text’s emphasis is δύναμις (dynamis) under trial, then coercive “beyond your means” preaching violates the same chapter’s anti-burden logic (2 Corinthians 8:13).


5) “Blessing,” not extraction: Paul fences against pressure

  • Lemma: εὐλογία (eulogia) = blessing/bounty.

  • In context: Paul wants the gift prepared as εὐλογία (eulogia) and not as πλεονεξία (pleonexia) = greed/exaction/covetous grasping (2 Corinthians 9:5).

  • Inference: Paul explicitly prohibits “pressured collection” dynamics. Any ministry strategy that relies on guilt, compulsion, or “you must give or else” is not merely unwise; it contradicts Paul’s stated boundary.


6) “Not under compulsion”: the logic-killer for seed-money technique

  • Key premise: “each as he has purposed… not reluctantly or of necessity” (2 Corinthians 9:7).

  • Inference: If giving is “not of necessity,” then any reading that makes giving a requirement to access blessing (seed-money “law”) fails Paul’s own condition.

This verse is the doctrinal firewall: it blocks both tithing-as-law and prosperity coercion from being smuggled into Paul’s metaphor.


7) The harvest is righteousness, not cash return

This is your strongest “interlinear anchor” against prosperity misuse.

  • Lemma: δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosynē) = righteousness/justice.

  • In context: God increases “the fruit/produce of your δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosynē)” (2 Corinthians 9:10).

  • Inference: Whatever “reaping” means in 2 Corinthians 9:6, Paul defines the increase in terms of righteous fruit, not financial multiplication to enrich the giver.

So the correct “return” category is moral/spiritual: righteousness-bearing effects—thanksgiving, worship, strengthened fellowship, and love made visible (2 Corinthians 9:11–14).


8) Continuity with Corinthians: collection anchored, meaning fenced

You asked for an explicit anchor earlier, and it matters here.

  • Explicit anchor: “the collection for the saints” in 1 Corinthians 16:1.

  • Consequence: 2 Corinthians 8–9 is best read as the theological framing and careful administration of that saints-directed relief.

  • Fence: even if the act includes material provision, Paul refuses every incentive structure that turns it into clergy gain, donor manipulation, or guaranteed personal return—because the governing outcomes are δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosynē) and thanksgiving, and the governing condition is “not under compulsion.”


9) Synthesis: material act, spiritual fruit, minister’s crown

This is the bridge back to the essay’s thesis line: the church is Paul’s boast/joy.

Premise set (from the text):

  1. Paul frames the act as χάρις (charis) working in the churches (2 Corinthians 8:1).

  2. He defines the participation as κοινωνία (koinōnia) in a saints-directed service (2 Corinthians 8:4; 2 Corinthians 9:1).

  3. He forbids coercion/exaction (πλεονεξία (pleonexia)) and necessity (2 Corinthians 9:5; 2 Corinthians 9:7).

  4. He defines the increase as fruit of δικαιοσύνη (dikaiosynē) (2 Corinthians 9:10).


Conclusion: Therefore, Paul is not providing a mechanism for “sow money → reap money.” He is describing grace-produced fellowship expressed in benevolence, whose “harvest” is righteousness-bearing fruit in the church. That fruit—faith expressed through love, sincerity without coercion, unity and thanksgiving—is precisely the kind of church-maturity that functions as Paul’s boast and joy (2 Corinthians 1:24; 2 Corinthians 8:24).

Translation Drift and Checklist (reuse as you study)

Here’s a tight taxonomy you can reuse (short labels + one-line definitions). You can drop this as a “Definitions” block in a Deep Dive section.

Translation & Interpretation Distortion Taxonomy

  • Literal / formal equivalence
    More word-for-word, keeps structure closer to Greek/Hebrew (but can sound awkward).

  • Dynamic equivalence
    More thought-for-thought, smoother English, but more translator interpretation baked in.

  • Paraphrase
    Not really translation; it’s explanatory rewording. Highest risk of importing theology.

  • Ellipsis filling (supplied words)
    Adding implied verbs/objects for readability (e.g., supplying “they gave”). Can be fine, but becomes dangerous when the supplied words are treated as “what the Greek says.”

  • Lexical tilt
    Choosing an English gloss that’s possible but steers meaning (e.g., “means” for δύναμις, “partner” for κοινωνία, “generosity” as the whole sense of ἁπλότης).

  • Theological harmonization
    Translating a term to match a doctrinal system/tradition, even if context would prefer a different shade.

  • Context stripping / proof-texting
    Not a translation method, but a handling method: lifting a verse out of its paragraph argument to support a pre-made claim.

  • Translation Drift (the term you’re referencing)
    The slow slide where a rendering becomes the “meaning,” then preaching builds on the English concept until it replaces the Greek lemma’s range and the passage’s constraints—often reinforced by tradition and repetition.

Heavy use in 2 Corinthians 8-9, clearly seen when using an interlinear Bible.
  1. Name the lemma, not the English word. If a sermon argument depends on an English term (“partner,” “means,” “seed”), identify the Greek lemma first (e.g., κοινωνία, δύναμις, δικαιοσύνη) and study it, refuse to let the English outrun it.

  2. Watch for “financializing” gloss choices. Ask: does the translation shift a broad/moral word into a money-category?
    Examples: “means” for δύναμις (capacity, power), “generosity” as the whole meaning of ἁπλότης (single-heartedness, purity), “partner” as modern donor-speak for κοινωνία (participation/fellowship).

  3. Mark ellipses (supplied words). If the translator inserts “gave,” “money,” “support,” etc., note it. Supplied words may be reasonable for readability, but they cannot become the foundation for doctrine or coercion.

  4. Lock the object of the action. Ask: fellowship of what? grace for what? service to whom?
    Example: κοινωνία is “of the service to the saints” (2 Corinthians 8:4), not “buy-in to a ministry brand.”

  5. Follow Paul’s explicit fences. Any reading that violates Paul’s stated conditions is invalid: “not as πλεονεξία (pleonexia)” (2 Corinthians 9:5), “not under compulsion” (2 Corinthians 9:7). Fundraising systems that rely on guilt, necessity, or promised personal return are fenced out by the text.

  6. Define “return” by the nouns Paul chooses. In 2 Corinthians 9:10 the harvest is δικαιοσύνη (righteousness). If a teacher defines the harvest as “money back,” they have replaced Paul’s noun with their own doctrine.

  7. Test with the church’s edification goal. If an interpretation produces manipulation, dependency, celebrity-ministry economics, or instability, it is already suspect because it fights the stated purpose of ministry: the building up of the body into unity and maturity (Ephesians 4:11–16).


Expanded synthesis — this “fruit” is the goal of ministry (Ephesians 4), and unsound doctrine opposes it

That fruit—faith expressed through love, sincerity without coercion, unity and thanksgiving—is precisely the kind of church-maturity that functions as Paul’s boast and joy (2 Corinthians 1:24; 2 Corinthians 8:24). Paul describes himself not as a lord over their faith but as a co-worker “for your joy,” because their standing firm is the point (2 Corinthians 1:24). And when he points to the churches’ love and integrity, he speaks of them as his “boasting” before others (2 Corinthians 8:24). In other words, Paul’s joy is not the extraction of resources but the formation of a people who truly live the gospel.

This aligns directly with the purpose statement of ministry in Ephesians 4. Christ gives gifted servants “for the equipping of the saints for the work of ministry, for the building up of the body of Christ,” until the church attains “the unity of the faith and of the knowledge of the Son of God,” growing into maturity and “to the measure of the stature of the fullness of Christ” (Ephesians 4:11–13). The means is “speaking the truth in love,” by which the whole body grows up into Christ (Ephesians 4:15–16). Therefore, anything that weaponizes Scripture to produce coercion, greed, or instability is not a harmless misemphasis—it is a contradiction of the stated end of ministry. Unsound doctrine is inherently set against this goal because it does not build unity of faith and knowledge; it produces turbulence, manipulation, and immaturity—the very condition Ephesians 4 warns against: being “tossed to and fro” by doctrinal winds and human craftiness (Ephesians 4:14).

So when Paul frames a saints-directed service as χάρις (grace), insists on ἁπλότης (single-hearted sincerity), forbids πλεονεξία (exaction/greed) and compulsion, and defines the increase as fruit of δικαιοσύνη (righteousness), he is not drifting into a money-mechanism—he is describing what edification looks like when grace is actually forming a mature body. This is why the church’s growth into Christ is the minister’s true “crown”: the gospel producing a stable, loving, truth-filled people who glorify God, care for one another, and are no longer vulnerable to manipulative distortions.


Popular (last 30 days)

The Tripartite Nature of Humanity: Spirit, Soul, and Body

The Tripartite Nature of Humanity: Spirit, Soul, and Body in Biblical Understanding The human being, as depicted in the Bible, is a multifaceted creation, often understood through the distinct yet interconnected components of spirit, soul, and body. While some theological perspectives lean towards a bipartite view (soul and body), which we do see in the Old Testament, a careful examination of the New Testament scripture reveals a compelling case for a tripartite understanding, where each is divided into or composed of three parts. Let’s explore the biblical distinction between spirit, soul, and body. The Body: Our Earthly Vessel The body is the physical form that interacts with the material world. From the very beginning, Genesis 2:7 states, " Then the Lord God formed man from the dust of the ground and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life, and the man became a living being ." This verse clearly establishes the body's origin from the earth, emphasizing its connec...

Blessed Are The Forgiven

Blessed! the one whose lawless deeds are forgiven and the one whose sins are covered over, blessed is the man whom sin, the Lord will not consider . * Paul writes David foresaw and spoke " blessed is the one whose transgression is forgiven, whose sin is covered . *  Blessed, is the one whom sin is not considered, this word considered  means "to credit, count, reckon, to set down as a matter of account; regard, think, consider." This blessing comes through faith and according to grace, " also David speaks of the blessedness of the one to whom God considers righteousness apart from works ." *  The word for  lawless deeds speaks of the violation of the Law and the word for sin  speaks of missing the mark of God's righteousness. Blessed are those who (by faith in Christ according to grace) have been forgiven. In Him receiving the redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of trespasses according to the riches of His grace . * This fundamental ...

Lord, Stand By Me

"... present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life, and your members to God as instruments for righteousness ." 1 This word for present means "I bring, present, come up to and stand by," it is parístēmi (from pará, "from close-beside" and hístēmi, "to stand") – properly, stand close beside, i.e. ready to present (exhibit). I pray Lord stand by me which expresses that I put my trust in Him, or I come up to and stand by Him. We use phrases like surrendering or bowing at the cross to explain such a moment, surely it is a coming to the end of ourselves and it is desirable that I find His will acceptable, but it is important to understand that it is about trust, not my will power, the key is that it is in Christ. The terminology the scriptures use is "present yourselves to God," or come up to and stand by and walk with Him. "... present your bodies as a living sacrifice, holy and pleasing to God--this...

Spirit of Life

" Indeed, the law of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus liberates from the law of sin and death ." 1 This word for liberates "I free, set free, liberate" is from a root word meaning free, exempt, not bound by an obligation. As partakers of God's divine nature, being born of Spirit, we are no longer obligated to the sinful nature but to righteousness which is God's nature. When we believe we receive the Spirit of promise, a guarantee of our inheritance, a great testimony that we are His children, it is a Spirit of Life. " Truly, truly, I say to you, whoever hears my word and believes him who sent me has eternal life. He does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life." 24 The Son came not to condemn the world but to save it. "One trespass   led to condemnation for all men, so one act of righteousness leads to justification and life for all men. " 6 " He was delivered over to death for our trespasses and wa...

The Church as Glory and Joy: Paul's Vision of Ministry Reward

The Church as Glory and Joy: Paul’s Vision of Ministry Reward A Theological Essay on Ministry, Servant Leadership, and the True Reward of Equipping the Saints Introduction Distortion of scripture is nothing new, Peter himself warned that Paul’s letters were being twisted even in the first century—some “distort” them, as they do “the other Scriptures” (2 Peter 3:16). Paul likewise warned that distortions would arise from within the church, with people speaking “twisted things” to draw disciples after themselves (Acts 20:29–30). And when the subject turns to money, the New Testament is especially direct. Paul cautions against those who imagine “godliness” as a means of gain (1 Timothy 6:5) and insists that gospel ministry must not be peddled for profit (2 Corinthians 2:17). Peter adds that false teachers exploit others “in their greed” (2 Peter 2:3), and Jude warns of those who “abandoned themselves for the sake of gain” (Jude 11). Paul also wrote some “teach… for shameful gain” ...

All Who Are Thirsty

“ Come, everyone who thirsts, come to the waters;  and he who has no money,  come, buy and eat!  Come, buy wine and milk  without money and without price.  Why do you spend your money for that which is not bread,  and your labor for that which does not satisfy?  Listen diligently to me, and eat what is good,  and delight yourselves in rich food. .." (Isaiah 55). " Come, buy wine and milk without money and without price ." Buy is defined as to acquire the ownership of by giving an accepted price or consideration therefore; to accept or believe as true .[ 1 ] When we buy something we consider the price that we must pay, we accept this and purchase the thing we have considered worthy of the sacrifice we make in payment. W e can not buy, with money or price, redemption from t his tragic flaw we are born into. However Jesus paid the price for us, so we buy or accept through consideration, the Greek word is  logizomai.[ 2] ...

True Widows: A Biblical Perspective

True Widows: A Biblical Perspective Throughout Scripture, God's compassion for widows is evident. He is portrayed as their defender, provider, and source of justice. The Bible repeatedly calls believers to care for widows, reflecting God's own heart for the vulnerable. However, in his letter to Timothy, the Apostle Paul provides a specific definition of a "true" widow, emphasizing the church's responsibility in supporting those who are genuinely in need. God's Compassion for Widows The Old Testament is rich with passages that reveal God's concern for widows. In Exodus 22:22, God commands, "You shall not afflict any widow or fatherless child." This verse underscores His protective nature, ensuring that widows are not mistreated or neglected. Similarly, Deuteronomy 10:18 declares, "He administers justice for the fatherless and the widow, and loves the stranger, giving him food and clothing." Here, God is depicted as a just and loving prov...

Sound Doctrine, Sound Minds, and the Word of Life

Sound Doctrine, Sound Minds, and the Word of Life The New Testament consistently links doctrine with the condition of the mind . Doctrine is never treated as a mere collection of correct statements to be affirmed, but as something formative—shaping how believers reason, how faith matures, and whether communities are built up or quietly destabilized. When doctrine is unsound—loosely grounded, selectively quoted, or driven by human agendas—it does not simply introduce error. It produces instability. Scripture describes this instability not as ignorance, but as a condition of being divided , tossed , and unsettled . The danger is not thinking too much, but thinking without a stable center . Murmuring, Confused Reasoning, and the Loss of Orientation Paul names this danger directly in Philippians: “Do all things without murmuring (γογγυσμός) and confused reasoning (διαλογισμός)… holding fast to the word of life.” — Philippians 2:14–16 The terms Paul uses are precise. The word mur...

The Promises of God — The Gospel Without Monetary Cost

Conversion, Gift, Priesthood, and the Stumbling Block of Money I. The Gospel Announced as Without Cost in Scripture The gospel is revealed in Scripture as without cost , without price , and without exchange . This is not rhetorical flourish, nor merely ethical exhortation, but a declaration about the nature of divine life and the way it is received. Isaiah proclaims to covenant-breaking Israel: “Ho! Everyone who thirsts, come to the waters; and he who has no money, come, buy and eat! Come, buy wine and milk without money and without price.” Isaiah 55:1 The command to “buy” while explicitly possessing “no money” abolishes transactional logic. What is offered is life from God, not a commodity. The absence of price is essential to the nature of what is given. If payment were possible, the gift would cease to be what it is. This prophetic declaration stands prior to any later ecclesial practice. It defines the category of the gospel before questions of ministry, support, or organization a...

The Promises of God — The Promise of Eternal Life

There is such a great promise of eternal life to the elect, through faith and knowledge of truth, "to the extent of the hope of eternal life, which God can not lie, promised before times eternal. Now, brought to light in his word at his own timing..." (Titus 1:2) Before time began God made a promise, established it on his oath,  there being nothing greater to  establish it on, but accordingly to  his purpose by which he can not lie.  "just as he chose us in him before creation of the world to exist holy and blameless in his presence in love predestining us for adoption as his own through Jesus Christ..." (Ephesians 1:4-5).    For those chosen this promise is very precious and honorable and effective. It is a promise that God will always be with us even to the end of the age. It is a promise he is working out all for good to those called according to His purpose. The promise is fulfilled through "predestinating us for adoption"  and adoption is of the S...